Comparative physiognomy; or, Resemblances between men and animals (1852)
Redfield, James W · New York, Redfield · leaf 48
o great shakes,after all! The consequence of this is, that it turns out asAppetite says: Insensibility is obliged to withdraw from thetail into the body, that he may receive a portion of the nour-ishment that Appetite would otherwise appropriate entirely toits own use. He reasons, with regard to… … He makes a virtue of necessity, and becomes on familiar termswith the servants that he was formerly in the habit of chas-tising. He lets down his dignity wonderfully —deserts thetail, which, like a pile without inhabitant, to ruin runs, andtakes up his residence in the back. But the less of a…
Physiognomy
Internet Archive · Medical Heritage Library · Public Domain Mark 1.0. Free to use for anything.
