Inside Out Library · Explore

A dispute against the English-Popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland : wherein not only our own arguments against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune, Burges, Sprint, Paybody, Andrewes, Saravia, Tilen, Spotswood, Lindsey, Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted (1637)

Gillespie, George, 1613-1648 · [S.l. : s.n.] · leaf 320

An illustration from A dispute against the English-Popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland : wherein not only our own arguments against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune, Burges, Sprint, Paybody, Andrewes, Saravia, Tilen, Spotswood, Lindsey, Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted, 1637, leaf 320
The fourth part <iAgainft the Indifferency of the Ceremonies. … CHAP* I. OfourOppofites pleading for the Indifferency of theCeremonies. F it feemeto any , that it is a Grange Methode tofpeakenowof lndifferency3in theend of this Dis-pute , which ought rather to have been handled in•i| the beginning of it: they may confider,thatthe Me-thode is not ours, but our…

Catholic Church · Church of Scotland · Puritans

Internet Archive · Princeton University Library · Public Domain Mark 1.0. Free to use for anything.

More pictures from A dispute against the English-Popish ceremonies, obtruded upon the Church of Scotland : wherein not only our own arguments against the same are strongly confirmed, but likewise the answers and defences of our opposites, such as Hooker, Mortoune, Burges, Sprint, Paybody, Andrewes, Saravia, Tilen, Spotswood, Lindsey, Forbesse, &c. particularly confuted

More like this