ier, without thedate it is true, but inproximity to two otherinscriptions (Figs. 69, 70),dated 1363 and 1428,with which it may becompared; and as thestyle of the lettering isif anything earlier thanthat of 1363, we mayfairly conclude that thecloister was built shortlyafter the foundation ofthe new… … llg. 6i Ch. XX.] Ragtisa: S. Francesco. 373 side of the cloister : it corresponds iii style with the work below, and must be of the same date, in j+SI)6-JTlflGTST^spite of the fact that iGfJ/n^CnTl POTRfl!? the year 1629 is cut onthe back of one of thestones, the date pro-bably of some repau-s.…
Art
Internet Archive · California Digital Library · Public Domain Mark 1.0. Free to use for anything.
