ome, 1785-7,has been suggested as a contributing cause. Sucha theory hardly squares wi:h the fact that themanner we associate with him is seen full-fledgedin the portrait of Chalmers of Pittencrieff, paintedin 1776. But why puzzle over such a ciuestion ?Is it not simpler to suppose that it came to… … IIV SIR II. KAEBUKN, K.A.(Cclltition 0/ Hm. AttLwan, En/.)
Art · Decoration and ornament
Internet Archive · University of Toronto, Robarts Library · Public Domain Mark 1.0. Free to use for anything.
